D2 Test
D2 Test - Related Videos
07:00
Eye-Tracking Control to Assess Cognitive Functions in Patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
0 Views •
Cited by 8 •
2016
Cognitive deficits are common in about one third of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, a neurological condition leading to progressive impairments in speech and movement abilities. To conduct cognitive tests in patients unable to speak or write a reliable and easy to administer eye-tracking paradigm was developed.
05:27
Inner Mitochondrial Membrane Sensitivity to Na+ Reveals Partially Segmented Functional CoQ Pools
0 Views •
Cited by 1 •
2022
This protocol describes a comparative assay, using mitochondrial complex activities CI+CIII and CII+CIII in the presence or absence of Na+, to study the existence of partially segmented functional CoQ pools.
07:10
A Rabbit Aortic Valve Stenosis Model Induced by Direct Balloon Injury
0 Views •
Cited by 2 •
2023
An appropriate animal model is needed to understand the pathologic mechanisms underlying aortic valve stenosis (AVS) and to evaluate the efficacy of therapeutic interventions. The present protocol describes a new procedure for developing the AVS rabbit model via a direct balloon injury in vivo.
07:14
Ookluc: A Plasmodium berghei Line for Identifying Transmission-blocking Compounds
0 Views •
2025
Plasmodium sexual development occurs in the mosquito midgut. Targeting the parasite's sexual stages is a promising strategy to block transmission. We developed Ookluc, a transgenic P. berghei expressing nanoluciferase after zygote formation, enabling high-throughput screening of transmission-blocking compounds. This article details the methods for screening using Ookluc.
12:48
Construction of Cell-based Neurotransmitter Fluorescent Engineered Reporters (CNiFERs) for Optical Detection of Neurotransmitters In Vivo
0 Views •
Cited by 17 •
2016
We present a protocol to create cell-based neurotransmitter fluorescent engineered reporters (CNiFERs) for the optical detection of volumetric neurotransmitter release.
FAQs
Omission errors occur when a participant fails to mark a target, whereas commission errors occur when a distractor is marked. These error types provide different information about performance: omissions may reflect difficulties maintaining accurate target detection, while commissions indicate problems suppressing irrelevant items. Examining both helps characterize attentional control more precisely than considering speed or total markings alone.
Time pressure makes participants balance rapid visual scanning with accurate discrimination between similar letters and symbols. This condition reveals how efficiently they maintain task rules while processing many competing visual details. The resulting performance can help distinguish differences in attentional control and visual processing efficiency that might be less apparent during an untimed task.
Distractors require participants to apply the target rules rather than mark items based only on superficial similarity. Because the rows contain closely related visual information, successful performance depends on selecting relevant items and rejecting non-targets. Variation in responses to distractors contributes to the interpretation of selective attention, particularly when commission errors occur under the test’s timed conditions.
Performance can be considered through two complementary dimensions: whether participants correctly discriminate targets from distractors and how efficiently they complete the scanning task within the allotted time. High accuracy with slower work and rapid performance with more errors may represent different attentional profiles. Considering these dimensions together gives a fuller picture of concentration and visual processing under pressure.
Administration follows a standardized paper-and-pencil format in which participants scan rows containing similar letters and symbols. They apply the specified target rules, mark qualifying items, and avoid distractors while working under timed conditions. The resulting markings can then be examined for accurate target responses, missed targets, and incorrect responses to non-target items.
Researchers can examine performance patterns involving attentional control, concentration, visual processing speed, and errors of omission or commission. These outcomes support comparisons across individuals or experimental conditions. For example, a study may evaluate whether attention-related performance changes between conditions by comparing how accurately and efficiently participants discriminate targets during the standardized task.
The test is useful when a study needs a standardized measure of selective attention, concentration, or visual discrimination under time pressure. Its fixed format supports comparisons across participants and conditions, making it relevant to research on cognitive performance and attention-related changes. Interpretation should consider both efficient responding and the specific pattern of errors produced during scanning.